A comprehensive mortgage lender scoring system using Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data.
Our scoring system evaluates mortgage lenders across multiple dimensions to help borrowers find lenders that best match their needs. Each score ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating stronger performance or expertise in that area.
A composite score reflecting a lender's overall performance in the mortgage market. This combines:
These components are combined using a geometric mean, which ensures lenders must perform reasonably well across all dimensions rather than compensating for weakness in one area with strength in another.
These scores measure how well a lender serves borrowers seeking specific loan types:
Each product score considers three factors with balanced weighting (~34/33/33):
This balanced approach ensures that both high-volume national lenders and regional lenders with strong local market presence are fairly represented.
A lender with a high FHA score, for example, demonstrates strong FHA lending through a combination of local market expertise and meaningful volume.
These scores indicate expertise in different loan purposes:
The methodology mirrors product scores, using the same balanced weighting of best market performance and volume metrics.
These scores show how well a lender serves specific geographic markets.
We evaluate two components:
These components are combined and then scored using a blend of:
A high geographic score indicates a lender with meaningful presence and focus in that area—not just a large lender who happens to do some business there.
Measures how efficiently a lender guides borrowers through the mortgage process to a definitive outcome.
We evaluate two aspects of lender performance:
A lender's raw approval rate can be misleading—a lender serving only prime borrowers will naturally have higher approval rates. Our process score adjusts for borrower characteristics and rewards lenders who help consumers get results, whether that's a closed loan or a clear explanation of why they don't qualify.
Evaluates how competitively a lender prices their loans compared to the market.
We analyze a blend of two pricing components:
This blended approach captures the full cost of a loan—a lender offering a low rate but high fees isn't necessarily a better deal than one with a slightly higher rate and minimal fees.
We then compare each lender's blended pricing to expected pricing based on:
Lenders who consistently offer better pricing than expected given these factors score higher. This helps identify lenders offering genuine value rather than simply serving lower-risk borrowers who naturally qualify for better terms.
| Score Range | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| 80-100 | Excellent - Among the top performers |
| 60-79 | Strong - Above average performance |
| 40-59 | Average - Typical market performance |
| 20-39 | Below average |
| 0-19 | Limited presence or performance |
All scores are calculated using Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data, which includes virtually all mortgage applications in the United States. This public dataset ensures transparency and comprehensive market coverage.