Get & compare mortgage quotes anonymously Start in My Home
VF

Veritas Funding

Independent Mortgage CompanyMidvale, UTHQDirectReviews near you on Google

We analyzed every closed loan from Veritas Funding 936 loans across 2k applications— and benchmarked them against peer lenders across the 5 Ps of Mortgage Shopping.

Safe Rate Ratings· each scored 1–5 against peer lenders
Pricing
Mediocre
1/5
vs. all lenders
Pull-through
Sound
3/5
closing strength
Product
Strong
4/5
FHA · Conventional · VA
Place
Sound
3/5
Multi-Region · 15 mkts

Safe Rate Summary

What They Do Well

  • Particularly strong in FHA and VA loans

Things to Think About

  • Pricing may be below industry average
  • Higher than average fees ($5,326)

Explore another lender or local market

Report Card

Veritas Funding performance at a glance

Overall Performance· Pricing & closing strength
Pricing
Rate competitiveness
Mediocre
+40.5 bps above market avg
Pull Through
Closing strength
Sound
Top 60% of lenders
By Loan Product· Specialization by type
Conventional
Sound
Top 60% of lenders
FHA
Strong
Top 40% of lenders
VA
Strong
Top 40% of lenders
By Loan Purpose· Transaction purpose mix
Purchase
Strong
Top 40% of lenders
Refinance
Strong
Top 40% of lenders
By Location· Geographic coverage
Geographic Reach
Multi-Regional · 16 markets
Sound
Top 60% of lenders

Loan Product Performance

Performance by Loan Product

Conventional
Overall
Sound
Product
Sound
Pricing
Mediocre
Pull Through
Sound
Volume238
Mix25.4%
Spread
+0.421%Above
Fees
$5,043Fees
FHA Loans
Overall
Sound
Product
Strong
Pricing
Mediocre
Pull Through
Sound
Volume475
Mix50.7%
Spread
+0.479%Above
Fees
$6,393Fees
VA Loans
Overall
Strong
Product
Strong
Pricing
Pull Through
Sound
Volume221
Mix23.6%
Spread
+0.031%Above
Fees
$4,907Fees

Loan Purpose Performance

Performance by Loan Purpose

Purchase
Overall
Sound
Product
Strong
Pricing
Mediocre
Pull Through
Strong
Volume378
Mix40.4%
Spread
+0.440%Above
Fees
$5,302Fees
Refinance
Overall
Acceptable
Product
Strong
Pricing
Mediocre
Pull Through
Acceptable
Volume558
Mix59.6%
Spread
+0.264%Above
Fees
$5,422Fees

At a Glance

Lender Overview

Lending Activity
Loans Originated
936
Applications
2,095
Volume
$320 million
Pricing & Closing
Avg Rate Spread
+0.405%
vs. market APOR
Avg Net Fees
$5,326
Origination − Credits
Pullthrough Rate
44.7%
Applications → Closed
Typical Borrower
Avg Loan Amount
$342,276
Avg Borrower Income
$105,183
Avg Property Value
$435,128

Geographic Coverage

Geographic Performance

Metro Areas
15
markets with activity
States Served
21
of 50 states + DC
Avg Place Specialization
Sound
3/5

States with Loan Originations

21
21 states with loan originationsAlaskaAlabamaArkansasArizonaCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutWashington, DCDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIowaIdahoIllinoisIndianaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMassachusettsMarylandMaineMichiganMinnesotaMissouriMississippiMontanaNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNebraskaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNevadaNew YorkOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVirginiaVermontWashingtonWisconsinWest VirginiaWyoming
Northeast1
NJ
Midwest4
ILINOHWI
South7
ARFLGANCSCTNTX
West9
AZCACOIDMTNMORUTWY

Top Metro Areas by Place Specialization Score

Volume 135Mix 14.42% of portfolio
75/100
Strong
Volume 61Mix 6.52% of portfolio
75/100
Strong
Volume 110Mix 11.75% of portfolio
74/100
Strong
Volume 33Mix 3.53% of portfolio
58/100
Sound
5© Jrozwado · CC BY-SA 4.0
St. George, UTMetro
Volume 21Mix 2.24% of portfolio
55/100
Sound
Volume 32Mix 3.42% of portfolio
51/100
Sound
7© DPPed · CC BY-SA 3.0
Phoenix, AZMetro
Volume 18Mix 1.92% of portfolio
44/100
Sound
8© chucka_nc · CC BY-SA 2.0
Charlotte, NC-SCMetro
Volume 15Mix 1.60% of portfolio
44/100
Sound
9© TheWxResearcher · CC0
Indianapolis, INMetro
Volume 14Mix 1.50% of portfolio
43/100
Sound
Volume 12Mix 1.28% of portfolio
43/100
Sound
Showing 10 of 15 metro areas

Top States by Place Specialization Score

Utah
Utah
1
UtahState
Volume 315Mix 33.65% of portfolio
78/100
Strong
Idaho
Idaho
2
IdahoState
Volume 78Mix 8.33% of portfolio
62/100
Strong
Georgia
Georgia
3
GeorgiaState
Volume 67Mix 7.16% of portfolio
57/100
Sound
South Carolina
South Carolina
4
South CarolinaState
Volume 49Mix 5.24% of portfolio
57/100
Sound
North Carolina
North Carolina
5
North CarolinaState
Volume 68Mix 7.26% of portfolio
56/100
Sound
Florida
Florida
6
FloridaState
Volume 65Mix 6.94% of portfolio
52/100
Sound
Tennessee
Tennessee
7
TennesseeState
Volume 34Mix 3.63% of portfolio
50/100
Sound
Arizona
Arizona
8
ArizonaState
Volume 34Mix 3.63% of portfolio
50/100
Sound
Ohio
Ohio
9
OhioState
Volume 32Mix 3.42% of portfolio
48/100
Sound
New Jersey
New Jersey
10
New JerseyState
Volume 26Mix 2.78% of portfolio
48/100
Sound
Showing 10 of 17 states

How We Rank Lenders

Our rankings use an equal-weight average of scores across our core categories (Pricing, Product, Pull-Through, Place), with lender promptness blended in when a lender has responded to real shopper quote requests.

Our Point System (Max 30 Points)

10/ 30 pts
Pricing
Rate and fee competitiveness (33%)
10/ 30 pts
Pull Through
Reliability in closing loans (33%)
10/ 30 pts
Product
Specialization in the loan type (33%)
💎
Champion(80%+ = 24-30 points)
Superstar(60-79% = 18-23 points)

Data Integrity & Updates

Data is updated quarterly based on the latest HMDA filings and proprietary SafeRate analysis. All metrics are calculated using standardized methodologies to ensure fair comparison across lenders.

Looking for a different lender?

Are you the owner of Veritas Funding?

Claim this profile to add your business logo, highlight verified loan officers, collect verified reviews, and customize your marketing presence.

Claim this Profile
The 5 PsRankings are calculated from observed lender differences on closed loans across Pricing, Pull-through, Product, and Place, plus Promptness when a lender has answered real shopper quote requests.
No Pay to PlayLenders cannot buy their way to the top. Rankings are 100% earned.
HMDA 2024Built using publicly available originated loan data from the federal government.
Peer BenchmarkedPerformance is normalized and benchmarked against peer institutions.